|Year : 2012 | Volume
| Issue : 1 | Page : 61-63
Microfilaria in cytological smears at rare sites coexisting with unusual pathology: A series of seven cases
Chayanika Pantola1, Sanjay Kala2, Asha Agarwal1, Lubna Khan1
1 Department of Pathology, Ganesh Shankar Vidyarthi Memorial Medical College, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India
2 Department of General Surgery, Ganesh Shankar Vidyarthi Memorial Medical College, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India
|Date of Acceptance||24-Jan-2012|
|Date of Web Publication||16-Jun-2012|
L-21, Ganesh Shankar Vidyarthi Memorial Medical College Campus, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh - 208 002
| Abstract|| |
Filariasis is a major public health problem in India and microfilaria is sometimes seen during routine fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) smears, but it is very rare to find microfilaria coexistent with neoplastic lesions. Here we report a series of seven cases in which microfilaria is associated with neoplastic lesions. Out of these seven cases one is benign and six are malignant. Also we first time report the microfilaria coexistent with parotid pleomorphic adenoma, undifferentiated carcinoma thyroid and gall bladder carcinoma.
Keywords: Breast, gall bladder, microfilaria, parotid, thyroid
|How to cite this article:|
Pantola C, Kala S, Agarwal A, Khan L. Microfilaria in cytological smears at rare sites coexisting with unusual pathology: A series of seven cases. Trop Parasitol 2012;2:61-3
| Introduction|| |
Microfilaria is a major public health problem in tropical and subtropical countries and is an endemic problem in India. Wuchereria bancrofti is the most common filarial infection.  Despite its high incidence it is unusual to find microfilaria in fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) smear and body fluids and it is rare to find microfilaria along with smears aspirated from neoplastic lesions. There are only few reported cases of coexistent microfilaria with neoplasm in the cytology literature.  Here we report a case series of seven cases in which microfilaria is found in the routine cytological smears without a clinical suspicion of filariasis. Out of these seven cases, six cases are benign and one is malignant.
| Case Reports|| |
A 35-year lady presented with firm to hard thyroid swelling of size 3×3 cm. Past history of high-grade fever with chills and rigor present two year back. Cytology revealed singly lying as well as loosely cohesive clusters of oval to spindle shaped cell along with microfilaria [Figure 1]a. A diagnosis of undifferentiated carcinoma was made. Peripheral blood smear (PBS) was positive for microfilaria.
|Figure 1: Smears reveal microfilaria with neoplastic lesion (H and E, ×1000). (a) Undifferentiated carcinoma thyroid; (b) pleomorphic adenoma parotid; (c) adenocarcinoma breast; (d) metastatic adenocarcinoma vertebrae; (e) adenocarcinoma gall bladder; (f) lung adenocarcinoma|
Click here to view
A 25-year male presented with parotid swelling. There was no other significant complaint. Cytology revealed both mesenchymal as well as epithelial component along with microfilaria [Figure 1]b. A diagnosis of pleomorphic adenoma was made. PBS was negative for microfilaria.
A 52-year female presented with right breast lump of 5×4 cm size. There was no other significant complaint. Cytology revealed highly atypical cell forming well-defined acini [Figure 1]c. A diagnosis of adenocarcinoma along with microfilaria was made. PBS was positive for microfilaria.
A 55-year female presented with back pain. There was no other significant complaint. It was clinically suspected as Pott's spine. Cytology revealed highly atypical cell lying singly as well forming acini at places [Figure 1]d. A diagnosis of adenocarcinoma with microfilaria was made. Primary was unknown. PBS was negative for microfilaria.
A 40-year male presented with gall bladder mass. There was no other significant complaint. Aspirate revealed adenocarcinoma along with microfilaria [Figure 1]e. PBS was negative for microfilaria.
A 60-year female presented with lung mass in left upper quadrant. There was a past history of high grade fever with chills 10 year back. At that time PBS was positive for microfilaria and patient took treatment for one year. Cytology revealed atypical cells along with microfilaria [Figure 1]f. Diagnosis of "smears highly suspicious for adenocarcinoma" was made. PBS was positive for microfilaria.
A 42-year male presented with neck secondaries with primary from larynx. There was no other significant complaint. Aspirate revealed atypical squamous cells along with microfilaria. A diagnosis of metastatic squamous cell carcinoma was made. PBS was positive for microfilaria.
| Discussion|| |
Microfilaria is a public health problem in tropical region of south east Asia including Indian subcontinent. It is caused by the nematode W. bancrofti, Brugia malayi, Brugia tumori and others and transmitted through bite of Culex mosquitoes.  The adults of the lymphatic filariae inhabit lymph vessels, where blockage and host reaction can result in lymphatic inflammation and dysfunction, and eventually in lymphedema and fibrosis. Other filariae mature in the skin and subcutaneous tissues, where they induce nodule formation and dermatitis; migrating filariae of these species can cause ocular damage. They were observed occasionally during routine cytological and histological examination from various benign lesions and they have rarely been detected in association with neoplastic lesions in cytological smears. In most of the reported cases microfilaria have been detected in lymph node, breast lump, bone marrow, bronchial aspirate, nipple secretions, pleural and pericardial fluid, ovarian cyst fluid and cervicovaginal smears.  In thyroid aspirate most of the literature revealed colloid goiter or follicular neoplasm with filaria but to the best of our knowledge it is the first case of microfilaria found in undifferentiated carcinoma of thyroid. ,
Microfilaria has been detected in breast, bone marrow, and lymph node aspirates, most being benign lesions with only few malignant cases. ,,, Similarly in parotid gland, gall bladder carcinoma and lung malignancy no case is found in association with any neoplastic lesion. Here we report it for the first time coexisting with neoplasm.
Most of the authors have explained that as microfilaria circulate in the vasculature and lymphatic system and whenever the neoplastic lesion causes vasculature or lymphatic obstruction they appear in the tissue fluid or shed off into the surface material. In malignancy increased blood vasculature also causes the increase deposition of microfilaria to these sites.  Ahluwalia et al., stated that larva may be present in the vasculature and aspiration may lead to the rupture of vessel and release of microfilaria into the aspirate from neoplasm.  Gupta et al. reported six cases where microfilaria were found in body fluids cytology and FNAC smears in association with tubercular pleural effusion/lymphadenitis, pregnancy, non Hodgkin's lymphoma, malnutrition and young age. Although the finding of microfilaria in cytological smears was considered incidental, the association of microfilaria with debilitating condition suggest that it is an opportunistic infection.  In literature there has been no data suggesting role of microfilaria in causing malignancy.
In our view, in the present series the presence of microfilaria in aspirate from neoplastic lesion is an incidental finding and there is no change in the clinical presentation of the tumor and that the patient might harbor subclinical filariasis when the patient developed tumor or metastasis of tumor.
To summarize filariasis may be detected in clinically unsuspected cases, so a high index of suspicion should be kept in mind and careful screening is mandatory for the search of coexisting pathology.
| References|| |
|1.||Park K. Park's Textbook of Preventive and Social Medicine. 18 th ed. Jabalpur, India: Bhanot Publishers; 2005. p. 211-6. |
|2.||Varghese R, Raghuveer CV, Pai MR, Bansal R. Microfilariae in cytologic smears: A report of six cases. Acta Cytol 1996;40:299-301. |
|3.||Rekhi B, Kane SV. Microfilariae coexisting with a follicular lesion in thyroid aspirate smears in an uncommon case of a retrosternal thyroid mass, clinically presenting as malignancy. CytoJournal 2011;8:4 |
|4.||Chowdhary M, Langer S, Aggarwal M, Agarwal C. Microfilaria in thyroid gland nodule. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2010;51:94-6. |
|5.||Yenkeshwar PN, Kumbhalkar DT, Bobhate SK. Microfilariae in fine needle aspirates: A report of 22 cases. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2006;49:365-9. |
|6.||Zafar U, Rahman K, Sherwani RK, Shahid M. Microfilalariae of Wucheria bancrofti in bone marrow. Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus 2009;25:42-3. |
|7.||Kolte SS, Satarkar RN, Mane PM. Microfilaria concomitant with metastatic deposits of adenocarcinoma in lymph node fine needle aspiration cytology: A chance finding. J Cytol 2010;27:78-80. |
|8.||Gupta S, Sodhani P, Jain S, Kumar N. Microfilariae in association with neoplastic lesions: Report of five cases. Cytopathology 2001;12:120-6. |
|9.||Ahluwalia C, Choudhary M, Bajaj P. Incidental detection of microfilariae in aspirates from Ewing's sarcoma of bone. Diagn Cytopathol 2003;29:31-2. |
|10.||Gupta K, Sehgal A, Puri MM, Sidhwa HK. Microfilariae in association with other diseases. A report of six cases. Acta Cytol 2002;46:776-8. |
|This article has been cited by|
||Cytological diagnosis of microfilaria at unusual sites in clinically unsuspected cases: some rare presentations of filariasis
| ||Shreekant Bharti,Neeraj Kumar Agarwal,Richa Katiyar,Saloni Dwivedi,Mridu Shri |
| ||Tropical Doctor. 2018; 48(4): 373 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Atypical cases of filariasis from a non-endemic area
| ||Parul Kodan,Nitin Gupta,Ankita Baidya,Ayan Basu,Abdul Razik,Ankit Mittal,Nishant Verma,Bijay Ranjan Mirdha,Sandeep Mathur,Madhu Rajeshwari,Neeraj Nischal,Manish Soneja,Naveet Wig |
| ||Drug Discoveries & Therapeutics. 2018; 12(4): 254 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Hallazgo incidental de microfilarias de Mansonella ozzardi en un paciente pediátrico con linfoma T anaplásico
| ||Amaranto Suárez Mattos,Alejandra Calderón,Ana Acevedo |
| ||Revista Colombiana de Cancerología. 2017; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|