Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
Users Online: 288
Home | About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current issue | Archives | Submit article | Instructions | Subscribe | Contacts | Login 

 Table of Contents  
Year : 2013  |  Volume : 3  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 85-86  

Chronic diarrhea due to Cyclospora spp. infection

Department of Microbiology, SRMMCH and RC, SRM University, Kattankulathur, Tamil Nadu, India

Date of Web Publication25-Jun-2013

Correspondence Address:
Subramnian Rajesware Swarna
Department of Microbiology, SRMMCH and RC, SRM University, Kattankulathur, Tamil Nadu
Login to access the Email id

DOI: 10.4103/2229-5070.113924

PMID: 23961450

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Swarna SR, Madhavan R, Gomathi S, Yadav D. Chronic diarrhea due to Cyclospora spp. infection. Trop Parasitol 2013;3:85-6

How to cite this URL:
Swarna SR, Madhavan R, Gomathi S, Yadav D. Chronic diarrhea due to Cyclospora spp. infection. Trop Parasitol [serial online] 2013 [cited 2018 Mar 23];3:85-6. Available from: http://www.tropicalparasitology.org/text.asp?2013/3/1/85/113924

Dear editor,

In March 2012, a old man presented with the complaints of shortness of breath, myalgia, fatigability, and anorexia. Physical examination revealed normal findings. He had history of watery stool since one month.

Stool and blood sample were collected. Macroscopic appearance of stool was yellow, watery with no blood and mucus. Microscopic examination of saline wet mount was negative for ova and cyst. Iodine wet mount of stool revealed moderate number of unicellular cysts with double layer [Figure 1]. Routine stool culture for bacteria was negative. The result of routine blood analysis was normal except for low hemoglobin content (4.2-g Hb/dl). Serological tests such as rapid human immunodeficiency virus test and hepatitis B surface Ag detection were negative.
Figure 1: Iodine wet mount of stool showing oocyst of Cyclospora spp. in unconcentrated stool (×40)

Click here to view

Stool examination was repeated after formal-ether sedimentation technique and modified acid-fast staining (AFB) was performed. Modified AFB staining revealed colorless to pink as well as deep purple oocysts, morphologically consistent with that of Cyclospora spp. oocysts, confirmed by more than one experienced personnel [Figure 2]. Subsequent stool sample also revealed oocyst like structure in iodine wet mount and modified AFB staining.

In most laboratories, stool is not usually examined for Cyclospora spp. unless such testing is requested. Under iodine wet mount, immature oocyst is uniformly spherical with bi-layered thick wall. Outer rough coat is thick while the inner layer is smooth with polar body and oocyst residuum in the center. [1],[2]
Figure 2: Modified acid fast staining of stool showing oocyst of Cyclospora spp. in unconcentrated stool (×100)

Click here to view

Most common method used to identify oocysts of Cyclospora is modified acid fast staining. [3],[4] The oocysts showed variability from no stain to light pink to deep purple under modified acid fast staining. The consistent morphology of Cyclospora spp. oocysts is confirmed by more than one experienced personnel. Since only trained personnel can identify oocyst, negative report is very likely. Oocyst of Cyclospora spp. is often confused with Cryptosporidium oocyst.

The identity of Cyclospora spp. oocyst is confirmed by ocular micrometer and ultraviolet (UV) fluorescence microscopy. Cyclospora oocyst are larger (8-11 μm) in diameter and are found in low to moderate numbers in stool than Cryptosporidium (4-6 μm) in diameter. [5] The identity and clinical relevance can be confirmed by repeating the stool examination for three consecutive days. Specific chemotherapy is available for Cyclospora spp. Therefore, it is important to differentiate oocyst of Cyclospora from Cryptosporidium oocyst.

The drug of choice for Cyclospora infection is trimethoprim-[sulfamethoxazole]. [5] Awareness among clinicians to request for modified acid fast staining in case of clinical suspicion of Cyclospora infection may help to know the presence of the oocyst of the parasite. Non-availability of ocular micrometer and UV fluorescence microscopy are the main limiting factors.

To conclude, the incidence of Cyclospora infection in the immunocompetent individual is underestimated due to lack of awareness and appropriate diagnostic methods for identification.

   References Top

1.Mansfield LS, Gajadhar AA. Cyclospora cayetanensis, a food- and waterborne coccidian parasite. Vet Parasitol 2004;126:73-90.  Back to cited text no. 1
2.Torres-Slimming PA, Mundaca CC, Moran M, Quispe J, Colina O, Bacon DJ, et al. Outbreak of cyclosporiasis at a naval base in Lima, Peru. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2006;75:546-8.  Back to cited text no. 2
3.Karanja RM, Gatei W, Wamae N. Cyclosporiasis; An emerging public health concern around the world and in Africa. Afr Health Sci 2007;7:62-7.  Back to cited text no. 3
4.Yazar S, Yalcln S, Sahin I. Human cyclosporiasis in Turkey. World J Gastroenterol 2004;10:1884-7.  Back to cited text no. 4
5.Iqbal J, Hira PR, Al-Ali F, Khalid N. Cyclospora cayetanensis: First report of imported and autochthonous infections in Kuwait. J Infect Dev Ctries 2011;5:383-90.  Back to cited text no. 5


  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]

This article has been cited by
1 Cyclospora cayetanensis infections among diarrheal outpatients in Shanghai: a retrospective case study
Yanyan Jiang,Zhongying Yuan,Guoqing Zang,Dan Li,Ying Wang,Yi Zhang,Hua Liu,Jianping Cao,Yujuan Shen
Frontiers of Medicine. 2018;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]


    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

  In this article
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded89    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal