|
 |
| ETHICS IN SERIES |
|
| Year : 2016 | Volume
: 6
| Issue : 1 | Page : 5-7 |
|
|
Utilitarian and deontological ethics in medicine
Jharna Mandal1, Dinoop Korol Ponnambath2, Subhash Chandra Parija1
1 Department of Microbiology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India
2 Department of Microbiology, PSG Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
| Date of Acceptance | 05-Jan-2016 |
| Date of Web Publication | 28-Jan-2016 |
Correspondence Address:
Jharna Mandal
Department of Microbiology, PSG Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu
India
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/2229-5070.175024
 Abstract | | |
Medical ethics is a sensible branch of moral philosophy and deals with conflicts in obligations/duties and their potential outcome. Two strands of thought exist in ethics regarding decision-making: deontological and utilitarian. In deontological approach, outcomes/consequences may not just justify the means to achieve it while in utilitarian approach; outcomes determine the means and greatest benefit expected for the greatest number. In brief, deontology is patient-centered, whereas utilitarianism is society-centered. Although these approaches contradict each other, each of them has their own substantiating advantages and disadvantages in medical practice. Over years, a trend has been observed from deontological practice to utilitarian approach leading to frustration and discontentment. Health care system and practitioners need to balance both these ethical arms to bring congruity in medical practice. Keywords: Deontology, ethics, utilitarianism
How to cite this article:
Mandal J, Ponnambath DK, Parija SC. Utilitarian and deontological ethics in medicine. Trop Parasitol 2016;6:5-7 |
Ethics is a crucial branch in medicine guiding good medical practice. It deals with the moral dilemmas arising due to conflicts in duties/obligations and the faced consequences. They are based on four fundamental principles, i.e., autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice. Much of the modern medical ethics deals with the moral dilemmas arising in the context of patient's autonomy and the fundamental principles of informed consent and confidentiality. Ethics deals with choices, decisions/actions based on the choice and the duties and obligations of a doctor to the best interest of the patient. Ethical practice is a systematic approach toward the institution of these principles to approach an appropriate decision-making. While these definitions are clear to express, exceptions arise in each of these principles during clinical practice. For example, when a doctor owes a duty to both patient and society, situations of breech in confidentiality may arise. Similarly, the practice of fundamental principles of autonomy and informed consent may be breeched in the care of newborn, mentally handicapped or patients in the permanent vegetative state. In practical ethics, two arms of thoughts exist in decision-making: Utilitarian and deontological. In utilitarian ethics, outcomes justify the means or ways to achieve it, whereas in deontological ethics, duties/obligations are of prime importance (i.e., end/outcomes may not justify the means).
In the utilitarian approach, decisions are chose based on the greatest amount of benefit obtained for the greatest number of individuals. This is also known as the consequentialist approach since the outcomes determine the morality of the intervention. This approach could lead to harm to some individuals while the net outcome is maximum benefit. This approach is usually guided by the calculated benefits or harms for an action or intervention based on evidence. A few examples of utilitarian approach in medical care include setting a target by hospitals for resuscitation of premature newborns (gestational age) or treatment of burns patients (degree of injury) based on the availability of time and resources. There are two variants of utilitarianism: Act utilitarianism and rule utilitarianism. Act utilitarianism deals with decisions undertaken for each individual case analyzing the benefits and harms promoting overall better consequences. Every action/decision arrived for each patient is confronted with the measurement of balance of the benefits and harms, without examining the past experience or evidence. This method would lead to enormous wastage of time and energy in decision-making and are prone to bias. In rule utilitarianism, no prediction or calculation of benefits or harms is performed. These decisions are guided by preformed rules based on evidence and hence provide better guidance than act utilitarianism in decision-making. According to rule utilitarianism, morally right decision is an action complying moral codes/rules leading to better consequences. [1] Although these concepts look appealing patients feels constrained when clinicians make the decisions, affecting the fundamental ethical principles. These ethical issues can be accommodated when dealing with patients who are competent to play a role in decision-making, while posing moral dilemmas in patients who are incompetent, e.g., in patients who are brain-dead (permanent vegetative state), decision-making with regards to withdrawal of life-sustainment/organ donation, etc. In the above scenario, dilemmas can be dealt ethically and legally if the patients had made advance decision directives about their life similar to decisions on wealth. [2],[3]
In contrast to the utilitarian concept, deontology is ethics of duty where the morality of an action depends on the nature of the action, i.e., harm is unacceptable irrespective of its consequences. This concept was introduced by a philosopher, Immanuel Kant and hence widely referred as Kantian deontology. The decisions of deontology may be appropriate for an individual but does not necessarily produce a good outcome for the society. The doctor-patient interaction or relationship is by nature, deontological since medical teaching practices inculcate this tradition, and when this deontological practice is breached, the context of medical negligence arises. This tradition drives clinicians to do good to patients, strengthening the doctor-patient bond. The deontological ideologists (doctors and other medical staffs) are usually driven to utilitarian approach by public health professionals, hospital managers, and politicians (utilitarian ideologists). From a utilitarian perspective, health care system resources, energy, money, and time are finite and are to be appropriately accommodated to achieve the best heath care for the society. These are executed with furnished rules and guidelines. While achieving good for the greatest number, few harm (iatrogenic) is acceptable by utilitarian ideologists. For example, few cases of vaccine-induced paralytic polio after oral polio vaccination. From a deontological perspective, utilitarians generalize the guidelines or rules while there may be exceptional cases where the guideline may not apply. Deviation of action from the guidelines contributes to medical negligence to utilitarians. Such conflicts in approach are commonly encountered in the current health care systems. Similarly, the involvement of third party payment systems (health insurance) affects the confidentiality between the doctor-patient relationship. [4]
Traditional moral analytical studies (Greene's dual process model) revealed that deontological and utilitarian inclinations are mutually exclusive while recent studies utilizing the process dissociation moral analytical approach revealed that an inclination toward an ideology may occur due to the absence of inclination to another. These studies also reported the association of deontological inclinations with empathy, religiosity, and perspective-taking, while moral concern and reduction in the cognitive load being associated with utilitarian inclinations. [5] In conclusion, both utilitarian and deontological perspectives have their own importance in medical ethics. In the current scenario, we get to see utilitarian perspective countermanding the deontological perspective and hence most ethical and moral dilemmas. A balance between these two perspectives would bring better harmony and justice to medical practice.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References | |  |
| 1. | Mack P. Utilitarian ethics in healthcare. Int J Comput Internet Manage 2004;12:63-72.  |
| 2. | de Groot J, van Hoek M, Hoedemaekers C, Hoitsma A, Smeets W, Vernooij-Dassen M, et al. Decision making on organ donation: The dilemmas of relatives of potential brain dead donors. BMC Med Ethics 2015;16:64. |
| 3. | Playford RC, Roberts T, Playford ED. Deontological and utilitarian ethics: A brief introduction in the context of disorders of consciousness. Disabil Rehabil 2015;37:2006-11. |
| 4. | Garbutt G, Davies P. Should the practice of medicine be a deontological or utilitarian enterprise? J Med Ethics 2011;37:267-70. |
| 5. | Conway P, Gawronski B. Deontological and utilitarian inclinations in moral decision making: A process dissociation approach. J Pers Soc Psychol 2013;104:216-35. |
| This article has been cited by | | 1 |
Professional, legal and ethical dimensions of prescribing. Part 2: legal and ethical |
|
| Jill Gould, Heather Bain | | Primary Health Care. 2023; 33(1): 27 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 2 |
An Oscillatory Path to Vaccination: The Roles of Normative and Epistemic Factors in Explaining Vaccination Hesitancy in COVID-19 |
|
| Narae Kim, Jeong-Nam Kim, Hyelim Lee, Loarre Andreu-Perez | | Health Communication. 2022; : 1 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 3 |
Auditing the Editor: A Review of Key Translational Issues in Epigenetic Editing |
|
| Katherine Huerne, Nicole Palmour, Angela Ruohao Wu, Stephan Beck, Alison Berner, Reiner Siebert, Yann Joly | | The CRISPR Journal. 2022; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 4 |
Computed tomographic colonography for symptomatic patients: the diminutive polyp dilemma |
|
| Christopher Hadjittofi, Vivek Sharma, Dhaara Bhatt, Tamam Rifai, Stuart Williams, Irshad Shaikh | | ANZ Journal of Surgery. 2022; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 5 |
Measuring school level attributable risk to support school-based HPV vaccination programs |
|
| C. Vujovich-Dunn, H. Wand, J. M. L. Brotherton, H. Gidding, J. Sisnowski, R. Lorch, M. Veitch, V. Sheppeard, P. Effler, S. R. Skinner, A. Venn, C. Davies, J. Hocking, L. Whop, J. Leask, K. Canfell, L. Sanci, M. Smith, M. Kang, M. Temple-Smith, M. Kidd, S. Burns, L. Selvey, D. Meijer, S. Ennis, C. Thomson, N. Lane, J. Kaldor, R. Guy | | BMC Public Health. 2022; 22(1) | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 6 |
Clinician and carer moral concerns when caring for children who tube-feed |
|
| Ann Dadich, Kaitlyn Hockey, Cathy Kaplun, Catharine Fleming, Nick Hopwood, Khadeejah Moraby, Chris Elliot | | Journal of Child Health Care. 2021; : 1367493521 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 7 |
Research ethics and resource allocation in times of covid-19 |
|
| Mariana Cabral Schveitzer,Beatriz da Costa Thome | | Revista Bioética. 2021; 29(1): 21 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 8 |
The Allocation of a Scarce Medical Resource: A Cross-Cultural Study Investigating the Influence of Life Style Factors and Patient Gender, and the Coherence of Decision-making |
|
| C. Keh, A. Furnham, A. McClelland, C. Wong | | Ethics & Behavior. 2021; : 1 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 9 |
Ethics for integrating emerging technologies to contain
COVID
-19 in Zimbabwe |
|
| Elliot Mbunge,Stephen G. Fashoto,Boluwaji Akinnuwesi,Andile Metfula,Sakhile Simelane,Nzuza Ndumiso | | Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies. 2021; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 10 |
Moral Decision-Making in Healthcare and Medical Professions During the COVID-19 Pandemic |
|
| Hamed Borhany, Soroosh Golbabaei, Mana Jameie, Khatereh Borhani | | Trends in Psychology. 2021; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 11 |
A Typical Perplexing Life-sustaining Therapy Decision at the End of life: A Case Report from Sri Lanka with Attributes Potentially worth Adopting from the UK Legislature |
|
| Gunasekara Vidana Mestrige Chamath Fernando,Shoba Narayanan Nair | | Indian Journal of Palliative Care. 2021; 27: 345 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 12 |
Letter to the Editor. Philosophical underpinnings of neurosurgical decision-making in the time of the coronavirus pandemic |
|
| Nalini Tata, Nader S. Dahdaleh | | Journal of Neurosurgery. 2021; 134(3): 1017 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 13 |
Respecting Human Autonomy in Critical Care Clinical Decision Support |
|
| Monique Hendriks,Martijn C. Willemsen,Francesco Sartor,Jettie Hoonhout | | Frontiers in Computer Science. 2021; 3 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 14 |
Isolation, Purification and Characterization of Proteins in “Señorita” Banana (Musa acuminata (AAA) ‘Señorita’) Pulp with Bioactive Peptides Exhibiting Antihypertensive and Antioxidant Activities |
|
| John Matthew Ferreras,Mia Claire Marie Clemencia,Amelia Hizon-Fradejas,Lawrence Yves Uy,Mary Ann Torio | | Applied Sciences. 2021; 11(5): 2190 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 15 |
Deontological or Utilitarian? An Eternal Ethical Dilemma in Outbreak |
|
| Po-En Tseng,Ya-Huei Wang | | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(16): 8565 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 16 |
The Theory of Planned Behavior and Marketing Ethics Theory in Predicting Digital Piracy Intentions |
|
| Ayi Ahadiat,Albet Maydiantoro,Fajrin Satria Dwi Kesumah | | WSEAS TRANSACTIONS ON BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS. 2021; 18: 690 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 17 |
Moral Decision-Making, Stress, and Social Cognition in Frontline Workers vs. Population Groups During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Explorative Study |
|
| Monica Mazza,Margherita Attanasio,Maria Chiara Pino,Francesco Masedu,Sergio Tiberti,Michela Sarlo,Marco Valenti | | Frontiers in Psychology. 2020; 11 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 18 |
Ethical issues in geriatric cranial neurosurgery |
|
| Laureen D. Hachem, Mark Bernstein | | Neurosurgical Focus. 2020; 49(4): E3 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 19 |
Natural disaster and rationing of care |
|
| Lodovico Balducci,Giuseppe Colloca | | Journal of Geriatric Oncology. 2020; 11(5): 750 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 20 |
Will the plant-based movement redefine physicians’ understanding of chronic disease? |
|
| Maximilian Andreas Storz | | The New Bioethics. 2020; 26(2): 141 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 21 |
A stakeholder meeting exploring the ethical perspectives of immediately sequential bilateral cataract surgery |
|
| Matthew Quinn, Daniel Gray, Ahmed Shalaby Bardan, Mehran Zarei-Ghanavati, John Sparrow, Christopher Liu | | Journal of Medical Ethics. 2020; : medethics- | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 22 |
Moral Reciprocity, Ethics of Appropriation of Indigenous Medicinal Plant Knowledge and Associated Biopiracy |
|
| Oscar Agbor Ambang,Sergio Alloggio,Roman Tandlich | | Acta Educationis Generalis. 2019; 9(2): 24 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 23 |
Treatment decision-making in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: Key factors for healthcare professionals. PRELIC study |
|
| Concepción Boqué,María Reyes Abad,María José Agustín,Manuel García-Goñi,Carolina Moreno,Clara Gabás-Rivera,Enrique Granados,Antonio Castro-Gómez,Carlos Pardo,Luis Lizán | | Journal of Geriatric Oncology. 2019; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 24 |
A clinical case study that raised ethical issues in a developing country |
|
| Uchenna Chinweokwu Onubogu | | Clinical Ethics. 2019; 14(3): 137 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 25 |
‘De overlevenden zullen de doden benijden’1 |
|
| Tom Duurland | | Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte. 2019; 111(4): 567 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 26 |
Formation of professional ethics of future physicians-surgeons, using a “case-study” technology |
|
| R. S. Gurevych,Ya. V. Tsekhmister,N. V. Kalashnik,O. M. Kobernyk,O. Yu. Lysenko | | Klinicheskaia khirurgiia. 2019; 86(7): 63 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 27 |
Psychological Mechanism of Corruption: A Comprehensive Review |
|
| Juneman Abraham,Julia Suleeman,Bagus Takwin | | Asian Journal of Scientific Research. 2018; 11(4): 587 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 28 |
Decision Making: Approaches and Tools to Respond to Ethical Issues in Genetic and Genomic Nursing |
|
| Mary Beth Steck | | Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing. 2018; 22(4): 386 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 29 |
Epilepsy surgery for children with severe developmental delay: An ethical double jeopardy |
|
| Han Yan,Carter Snead,George M. Ibrahim | | Epilepsy & Behavior. 2018; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 30 |
Who decides in withdrawal of treatment in a critical care setting? A case study on ethical dilemma |
|
| Chunmei Lyu,Li Zhang | | International Journal of Nursing Sciences. 2018; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 31 |
The potential of task-shifting in scaling up services for prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV: a time and motion study in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania |
|
| Helga Naburi,Anna Mia Ekström,Phares Mujinja,Charles Kilewo,Karim Manji,Gunnel Biberfeld,David Sando,Guerino Chalamila,Till Bärnighausen | | Human Resources for Health. 2017; 15(1) | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | |
|
 |
|
|
|
