|Year : 2020 | Volume
| Issue : 2 | Page : 120-123
Rhinosporidiosis in Central India: A cross-sectional study from a tertiary care hospital in Chhattisgarh
Rakesh Kumar Gupta1, Bhanu Pratap Singh2, BR Singh3
1 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India
2 Department of Pathology, Chhattisgarh Institute of Medical Sciences, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, India
3 Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Chhattisgarh Institute of Medical Sciences, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, India
|Date of Submission||01-Oct-2019|
|Date of Decision||16-Nov-2019|
|Date of Acceptance||02-Dec-2019|
|Date of Web Publication||23-Jan-2021|
Rakesh Kumar Gupta
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Academic Block, Third Floor, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur - 492 001, Chhattisgarh
| Abstract|| |
Background and Aims: Chhattisgarh is an endemic region for rhinosporidiosis infection in Central India. This high prevalence can be explained by suitable hot tropical environment as well as social practice of common bathing of public with animals outdoor, mainly in ponds and river. There are more than 200 ponds in and around Bilaspur district, mainly in Ratanpur region. However, due to limited literature describing rhinosporidiosis from this part of India, it remains neglected and still not recognized as a serious health-care issue and any definite government or private measures/initiatives are not taken to counter this problem.
Materials and Methods: It is a retrospective demographic study analyzing 113 consecutive biopsies received from different clinical departments in a tertiary care center with a histological diagnosis of rhinosporidiosis over a period of 7 years from January 2011 to December 2017.
Results: Most of the patients presented in the otorhinolaryngology (86.7%) department, followed by ophthalmology (10.6%). The mean age of the patients was 23.4 years, with a range of 3–70 years. A male-to-female ratio of about 3:2 was noted. Nasal cavity was the most common site of involvement (90/113), followed by conjunctiva (7/113), nasal cavity with oropharynx (6/113), and eyelid (3/113). Patients' complaints showed a varying range from nasal block, nasal mass, bleeding, bleed on touch, difficulty in breathing, and conjunctival mass. Two of the cases presented as recurrent rhinosporidiosis.
Conclusion: Rhinosporidiosis is endemic and possesses a great health-care burden in Chhattisgarh. The socioeconomic status, outdoor bathing, and cultural practice in rural areas are the major factors contributing to newer cases. An urgent government initiative to decontaminate public water bodies and public health education through health-care workers and nongovernment organizations is the need of the hour to curtail the incidence of rhinosporidiosis.
Keywords: Epidemiology, rhinosporidiosis, Rhinosporidium seeberi
|How to cite this article:|
Gupta RK, Singh BP, Singh B R. Rhinosporidiosis in Central India: A cross-sectional study from a tertiary care hospital in Chhattisgarh. Trop Parasitol 2020;10:120-3
| Introduction|| |
Rhinosporidiosis is a chronic, granulomatous disease characterized by reddish mulberry-like polypoidal masses typically involving nasal cavity and nasopharynx. Other sites which are reportedly involved include maxillary sinus, ethmoid sinus, conjunctiva, lacrimal gland, oral cavity, and genitalia. It is caused by a protist Rhinosporidium seeberi. Tropical hot climate is very favorable for this organism. Hyperendemicity is noted in Sri Lanka and South India. However, it is also highly prevalent in Central India, particularly Chhattisgarh state, due to hot tropical weather, large number of artificial water reservoir as well as social and cultural practice. The organism flourishes in stagnant water of ponds, tanks, well, and river. It not only affects humans but also infects primates, mainly livestock. Transepithelial infection through breached epithelium is the most accepted mechanism proposed for its transmission. Herein, we are describing the second largest regional cross-sectional study from a tertiary care center in Bilaspur district, Chhattisgarh, Central India, mainly pertaining to the sociodemographic profile and clinical presentations in rhinosporidiosis patients with review of literature.
| Materials and Methods|| |
This is a retrospective demographic study analyzing 113 consecutive biopsies received from different clinical departments in a tertiary care center with a histological diagnosis of rhinosporidiosis over a period of 7 years from January 2011 to December 2017. Most of the patients presented in the otorhinolaryngology department, followed by ophthalmology, dentistry, and general surgery. A detailed clinical, social, and environmental history was taken with special emphasis to bathing habits. Routine examinations including hemogram, X-ray, blood grouping, and viral markers (hepatitis C, hepatitis B, and HIV) were performed in each patient. After preanesthetic clearance, all the patients were subjected to excision of the mass/polyp with electrocauterization of base. All the tissues submitted in 10% formalin in the department of pathology for histopathological examination. Sections of 5-μ thickness were stained in hematoxylin and eosin stain for microscopic examination.
| Results|| |
Of the 113 cases, majority of the patients presented in the otorhinolaryngology (86.7%) department, followed by ophthalmology (10.6%), dentistry (1.7%), and general surgery (0.8%). The mean age of the patients was 23.4 years, with a range of 3–70 years. A male-to-female ratio of about 3:2 was noted. The site-wise distribution of cases [Table 1] showed the highest number of cases in nasal cavity with nasal block as the most common presenting symptom. Other clinical presentations are summarized in [Table 2]. In most of the cases, clinical diagnoses were straightforward; however, in some cases, other differentials such as hemangioma, antrochoanal polyp, angiofibroma, granulomatous inflammation, and malignant lesion were also considered. Two of the cases presented as recurrent rhinosporidiosis.
|Table 1: Site-wise distribution of the rhinosporidiosis cases in the study|
Click here to view
|Table 2: Summary of the clinical presentation of the patients of rhinosporidiosis|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
Rhinosporidiosis was previously considered as a fungal disease endemic in some parts of world. However, currently, it is considered as protist classified under Mesomycetozoea. Stagnant contaminated water in artificial as well as natural water bodies serves as a main reservoir of the organism.
Studies by Kutty et al. and Guru and Pradhan in their series reported that the maximum number of cases lies in the age group of 21–30 years., However, in this study, the highest number of cases (43.3%) was represented in 11–20 years' age group, followed by 28.3% of cases in 21–30 years' age group. This can be explained by frequent engagement of young children in outdoor bathing in rural areas. A higher male prevalence of 1.5:1 was noted which is similar to the previous reports of Karthikeyan et al. and Arseculeratne et al. Satyanarayana suggested that estrogen in females might be protective against infection by R. seeberi. However, the cultural and social practice of lesser exposure of females for bathing in outdoor water bodies may be an important factor for low level of occurrence of disease.
Krishnamoorthy et al. in their article claimed a preliminary report of culture of R. seeberi from nasal swab of a patient. This explains that droplet infection can also act as an important route of infection for transmission of the organism from person to person in crowded, poor hygiene communities among developing countries. Furthermore, the soil and sand near the water bodies such as river and pond is contaminated with the organism and its spores lies remain dormant which becomes active in contact with living tissue. Hence, the source of infection can be contaminated water, soil as well as air droplets.
In the literature, different routes of spread in the body are described for R. seeberi including contiguous spread, autoinoculation, lymphatic, and hematogenous. The contiguous spread of disease is explained by simultaneous involvement of close proximity sites such as nasal cavity to different sinuses, oropharynx, and conjunctiva. Although systemic dissemination is very uncommon, few case reports describing widespread subcutaneous nodular lesions and involvement of lungs are reported.,
Grossly, the typical lesion of rhinosporidiosis is hyperplastic, fleshy, reddish granular, polypoidal, sessile/pedunculated mass and studded with yellowish-white pinhead dots representing sporangia over the surface of lesion [Figure 1]. Microscopically, it shows large (100–450 μm), thick-walled chitinous sporangia filled with innumerable numbers of endospore, each measuring about 6–10 μm, accompanied by a mixed inflammatory infiltrate [Figure 2]. In addition, frequent squamous metaplasia is also noted in the overlying lining epithelium. A granulomatous response occurs in case of rupture of the sporangia.
|Figure 1: Representative clinical images of the rhinosporidiosis cases: (a) a patient with a typical red mulberry-like polypoidal mass in the left nasal cavity, (b) a young patient with oropharyngeal rhinosporidiosis, (c) A case of conjunctival rhinosporidiosis|
Click here to view
|Figure 2: Representative histological images of rhinosporidiosis: (a) multiple sporangia filled with innumerable number of endospores and granulomatous reaction including multiple foreign body-type giant cells (H and E, ×100), (b) chronic inflammatory cell infiltrate surrounding sporangia and comprising mainly of plasma cells and lymphocytes (H and E, ×100), (c) necrotic tissue around spores (H and E, ×100), (d) skin involvement by rhinosporidiosis (H and E, ×100)|
Click here to view
Gomori's methenamine silver stain, periodic acid–Schiff stain, and Verhoeff–Van Gieson stain can be used to further highlight endospores and spherules. Histological differentials considered are cryptococcosis, Coccidioides immitis, Blastomyces dermatitidis, and myospherulosis.
Although the typical look of rhinosporidiosis, a fleshy mulberry-like mass with dotted sporangia, is usually sufficient to arrive at a clinical diagnosis, delayed presentation and extranasal involvement of multiple anatomically unrelated sites sometimes make the diagnosis difficult. The clinical presence of typical nasal cavity lesion, with multiple lesions in the other parts of respiratory tract or elsewhere in the body is enough to make a correct diagnosis.
A remarkable variation is reported in the postoperative recurrence in different studies which may be attributed to many factors such as operative procedure, type of instrument (cautery/laser) used for excision, site of involvement, and re-exposure to the organism. Although a large body of literature exists regarding this problem, postoperative recurrence rates continue to vary, and the effect of public health education in the eradication of this disease has not been taken into account.
More importantly, this study highlights the effect of public health education regarding susceptible habits in the transmission of rhinosporidiosis, which has helped reduce the incidence of this disease in the previously endemic communities of Pondicherry region.
Diathermy excision is considered to be the treatment of choice. Diathermy excision is an acceptable treatment modality in cases of nose and nasopharyngeal presentations. However, when there is involvement of the tracheobronchial tree, a more radical approach may be considered. Now, as LASER is available at some centers, the choice of treatment may be cauterization with LASER through a bronchoscope. However, LASER is still not freely available in India and Sri Lanka where rhinosporidiosis is endemic.
| Conclusion|| |
Rhinosporidiosis is an infectious disease with a high prevalence in tropical hot region of Central India. It is strongly associated with farming and animal husbandry in rural part of Chhattisgarh where outdoor public bathing is a common practice. Bilaspur district is one of the hot spots due to large number of contaminated ponds and water bodies. A concrete urgent government-aided public health awareness program is the need of the hour in this region to combat with rhinosporidiosis.
It is a cross-sectional epidemiology study highlighting the regional prevalence of rhinosporidiosis, clinical presentation, local factors, and pathogenesis. However, no water sampling or any microbiological/genetic analysis is performed.
Declaration of patient consent
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Makannavar JH, Chavan SS. Rhinosporidiosis-a clinicopathological study of 34 cases. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2001;44:17-21.
] [Full text]
Sudarshan V, Goel NK, Gahine R, Krishnani C. Rhinosporidiosis in Raipur, Chhattisgarh: A report of 462 cases. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2007;50:718-21.
Karthikeyan P, Vijayasundaram S, Pulimoottil DT. A retrospective epidemiological study of rhinosporidiosis in a rural tertiary care centre in Pondicherry. J Clin Diagn Res 2016;10:MC04-8.
Kutty MK, Sreedharan T, Mathew KT. SOME observations on rhinosporidiosis. Am J Med Sci 1963;246:695-701.
Guru RK, Pradhan DK. Rhinosporidiosis with special reference to extra nasal presentation. J Evol Med Dent Sci 2014;22:6189-99.
Arseculeratne SN, Sumathipala S, Eriyagama NB. Patterns of rhinosporidiosis in Sri Lanka: Comparison with international data. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 2010;41:175-91.
Satyanarayana C. Rhinosporidiosis with a record of 255 cases. Acta Otolaryngol 1960;51:348-66.
Krishnamoorthy S, Sreedharan VP, Koshy P, Kumar S, Anilakumari CK. Culture of Rhinosporidium seeberi: Preliminary report. J Laryngol Otol 1989;103:178-80.
Ashworth JH. On Rhinosporidium seeberi
(Wernicke, 1903) with special reference to its sporulation and affinities. Trans R Soc Edinb 1923;53:301-42.
Rajam RV, Viswanathan GC. Rhinosporidiosis: A study with a report of a fatal case with systemic dissemination. Indian J Surg 1955;17:269-98.
Ho MS, Tay BK. Disseminated rhinosporidiosis. Ann Acad Med Singapore 1986;15:80-3.
Kumari R, Nath AK, Rajalakshmi R, Adityan B, Thappa DM. Disseminated cutaneous rhinosporidiosis: Varied morphological appearances on the skin. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2009;75:68-71.
] [Full text]
Saha J, Basu AJ, Sen I, Sinha R, Bhandari AK, Mondal S. Atypical presentations of rhinosporidiosis: A clinical dilemma? Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011;63:243-6.
Bandyopadhyay SN, Jana U, Bandyopadhyay G, Majhi TK, Sen S, Das S, et al
. Rhinosporidiosis: Various presentations and different sites. Bengal J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2015;23:48-56.
Arseculeratne SN. Recent advances in rhinosporidiosis and Rhinosporidium seeberi
. Indian J Med Microbiol 2002;20:119-31.
] [Full text]
Ratnakar C, Madhavan M, Sankaran V, Veliath AJ, Majumder NK, Rao VA. Rhinosporidiosis in Pondicherry. J Trop Med Hyg 1992;95:280-3.
Kameswaran M, Kumar RS, Murali S, Raghunandhan S, Jacob J. KTP-532 laser in the management of rhinosporidiosis. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005;57:298-300.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2]
[Table 1], [Table 2]